PRINSIP KOOPERATIF, KESANTUNAN, DAN PARAMATER PRAGMATIK DALAM WACANA HUMOR GUS DUR

Authors

  • D. Jupriono university of 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Keywords:

verbal humour, speech acts, cooperative principle, politeness principle, pragmatic parameter

Abstract

This research discusses the verbal humour of Gus Dur from the perspective of speech acts (cooperative principle, politeness principle and pragmatic parameter). With qualitative approach and constructivistic paradigm, this study applies the strategy of text ethnography. By referential identity method and documentation, selection, classification and explanation technique, finally it is known that in the verbal humour of Gus Dur, there are always deviations on the cooperative principle (maxim of quantity, quality, relevance and manner), the polite­ness principle (tact, generosity, approbation, modesty, agree­ment, and sympathy maxim), and pragmatic parameter (distance, power, and rank rating).

Author Biography

D. Jupriono, university of 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Nama: D. Jupriono

Program Studi: Ilmu Komunikasi

Pendidikan: S1 di Jurusan Sastra Indonesia IKIP Malang, 

Magister di Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas dr. Soetomo,

Karya Ilmiah: Political Rethoric of President Joko Widodo Critical Discourse Analysis dimuat dalam Journal of Education and Practice (2018).

Bidang kajian: Critical Discourse Analysis, Komunikasi Politik, Semiotika Sosial/Politik, Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan.

Aktif di beberapa asosiasi akademik seperti Asosiasi Penerbit Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Indonesia (APJIKI), Ikatan Sarjana Ilmu Komunikasi Indonesia (ISKI), Asosiasi Pendidikan Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi (ASPIKOM) Jawa Timur.

References

Adnan, M.M. (ed.). (2000). Presiden Dur yang Gus Itu: Anehdot-anehdot K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid. Surabaya: Risalah Gusti.

Aitchison, J. (2010). Aitchison’s Linguistics. Teach Yourself Linguistics. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Blacklick, OH, USA.

Anderson, B. R. O'G. (2006). The languages of Indonesian politics, p. 123-151 in: Language and Power: Exploring Political Cultures of Indonesia. Jakarta-Kuala Lumpur: Equinox Publishing.

Anderson, B. R. O'G. (2006a). Cartoons and monuments: The evolution of political communication under the New Order, p. 152-193 in: Language and Power: Exploring Political Cultures of Indonesia. Jakarta-Kuala Lumpur: Equinox Publishing.

Attardo, S. (2014). Jokes, p. 417-418 in: Attardo, S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Humor Studies. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

Basyaib, H. & Hermawan, F.W. (ed.). (2010). Ger-geran bersama Gus Dur. Jakarta: Nawas, Pustaka Alvabet.

Bungin, B. (2021). Penelitian kualitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan public, dan ilmu social lainnya. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Chiaro, D. (2016). The language of Jokes: Analyzing verbal play. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203135143. Akses: 08-09-2022.

Chiaro, D. (2018). The Language of jokes in the digital age: Viral humour. London & New York: Routledge.

Crystal, D. (2017). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. 3rd ed., 6th print. Cam¬bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eriyanto. (1999). Otoriterisme Orde Baru: Studi Pidato Suharto. Wacana 2(1).

Hooker, V.M. (1996). Bahasa dan Pergeseran Kekuasaan di Indonesia. Hal. 56–76 dalam Latif & Ibrahim (ed.), Bahasa dan Ke-kuasaan. Bandung: Mizan.

Ismail, M. et. al. (2017). Melawan melalui lelucon: Kumpulan kolom Abudrrahman Wahid (Gus Dur). Jakarta: Tempo.

Jupriono, D. (2009). Wacana humor Gus Dur dalam perspektif tindak tutur. https://sastra-bahasa.blogspot.com/2009/09/wacana-humor-gus-dur-dalam-perspektif.html. Akses: 08-09-2022.

Jupriono, D. (2020). Humor Gus Dur: Multikulturalisme-inklusif vs sektarianisme-eksklusif. https://opiniindonesia.com/2020/09/22/humor-gus-dur-multikulturalisme-inklusif-vs-sektarianisme-inklusif/. Akses: 18-03-2021; juga di: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=964055267412762&id=100014248. Akses: 08-09-2022.

Jupriono, D. (2021). Humor hoax: Kritik sosial kepada penguasa. Opini Indonesia, 18 Mei 2021. https://opiniindonesia.com/2021/05/18/humor-hoax-kritik-sosial-kepada-penguasa/ Akses 18-07-2021.

Jupriono, D. & Andayani, A. (2018). Analisis tindak tutur wacana humor agama-agama di Indonesia. Parafrase: Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Cultural Studies, 18(1). http://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/parafrase/article/view/1381. Akses 01-09-2021.

Jupriono, D.; Kuncoro, W.; Pramono, B.S. (2022). Unsur konvensional-inkonvensional dalam wacana humor cerita wayang. Tanda: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Bahasa dan Sastra, 2(1), 30–41. https://aksiologi.org/index.php/tanda/article/view/316. Akses 20-12-2022.

Jupriono, D.; Rahayu, A.C.; Novaria, R. (2020). Penyuluhan kesantunan multikultural dalam komunikasi lintas budaya melalui humor Gus Dur. Laporan Akhir Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, LPPKM, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya.

Leech, G.N. (2016). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman Linguistics Library. Publisher Taylor & Francis Group.

Levinson, S.C. (1995). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mulyana, D. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Paradigma baru ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Musa, H. (1998). Humor Madura Penyegar Jiwa. Jakarta: PT Prestasi Insan Ind.

Nadjib, E.A. (2013). Slilit Sang Kiai. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka.

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanism of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co.

Samsuri. (1997). Analisis Wacana. Surabaya: Fakultas Sastra, Untag Surabaya.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Yogya¬karta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Suprana, J. (2019). Humor di tengah masyarakat. Prisma, 38(1), 112-121.

Tamer, G. (2014). Humor in Arabic culture, p. 55-59 in: Attardo, S. (ed.)., Encyclopedia of Humor Studies. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

Tim Incres. (2000). Beyond The Symbols: Jejak Antropologis Pemiki¬ran dan Gerakan Gus Dur. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wahid, A. (1999). Mengurai Hubungan Agama dan Negara. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Wahid, A. (2010). Kiai Nyentrik Membela Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Wahid, A. (2010). Prisma Pemikiran Gus Dur. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Wahid, A. (2011). Menggerakkan tradisi: Esai-esai pesantren. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Wahid, A. (2018). Tuhan Tak Perlu Dibela. Yogyakarta : IRCiSoD.

Wahid, A., dkk. (2010). Islam Tanpa Kekerasan. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Wangsomchok, C. (2016). A Linguistic Strategies to Express Humor in Thai Context. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(6), June 2016, pp. 462-465. http://www.ijssh.org/vol6/691-H023.pdf. Akses 23-08-2022.

Wijana, I D.P. (2016). Political Humor in Indonesian. KnE Social Sciences The 1st International Conference on South East Asia Studies (ICSEAS 2016). Pages 312–331. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i5.2340. Akses 12-07-2021.

Wijana, I D.P. (2019). Wacana Kartun Bahasa Indonesia. Prisma 38(1), pp. 14-28. https://prismajurnal.com/edition.php?id={9E71A03E-ED5E-C99D-BBDA-4855B0BCFD21}&no=1. Akses 23-08-2021.

Wilson, C.P. (2009). Jokes: Form, Content, Use and Function. London: Academic Press.

Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

Jupriono, D. (2023). PRINSIP KOOPERATIF, KESANTUNAN, DAN PARAMATER PRAGMATIK DALAM WACANA HUMOR GUS DUR. TANDA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Bahasa Dan Sastra (e-ISSN: 2797-0477), 3(02), 49–69. Retrieved from https://aksiologi.org/index.php/tanda/article/view/971

Issue

Section

KESUSASTRAAN