ANALISIS WACANA & ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS BERITA KONFLIK BURUH P.T. FREEPORT INDONESIA
Keywords:
descriptive discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, cohesion-coherence, hidden element, knowledge-powerAbstract
Descriptive discourse analysis (DDA) considers discourse as a bigger language unit than sentence and as merely neutral linguistic phenomenon, meanwhile critical discourse analysis (CDA) (Foucault) sees discourse as constructed linguistic practice which builds social practice to change or keep power dominance. If the focus of DDA is on cohesion-coherence of text in making the unity of textual meaning, the focus of CDA is on the totality of relation of discourse which reveals and hidden to uncover the relation of power dominance among the groups inside. In DDA conclusion of the text of Freeport mine labor conflict news is: “Intimidation act of the strike labors towards the non-strike labors has caused PT Freeport to stop the production activity”. In CDA the text of the same news will be interpreted as: “Salary range based on race discrimination in Freeport labors increases horizontal conflict which is reconciled through dialogues under the control of company, so it guarantees labor’s obedience and productivity and covers the reality at once that Freeport gets so big benefit, Freeport exploitation has destroyed environment, and Timika people are still in poverty“.
References
Alba-Juez, L. (2009). Perspectives on discourse analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge S.P.
Brown, G.; Yule, G.. (1988). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Beaugrande, R.A.; Dressler, W.U. (2016). Introduction to text linguistics. Ed. III. Harlow-Essex: Longman.
Eriyanto. (2018). Wacana: Perspektif Foucault, hal. 65-84 dlm. Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: LKIS.
Halliday, M.A.K.; Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English. London: Routledge Ltd. (e-book).
Haryatmoko. (2010). Michel Foucault membuka kedok pengetahuan, kekuasaan, dan kebenaran, (hal. 8-13) dlm. Dominasi penuh muslihat: Akar kekerasan dan diskriminasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Haryatmoko. (2012). Michel Foucault dan politik kekuasaan: Membongkar teknik, mekanisme, dan strategi kekuasaan. Materi Pelatihan analsisis wacana Michel Foucault. UK2JT, FIB Unair, 1 Maret 2012.
Haryatmoko. (2013). Critical discourse analysis (analisis wacana kritis). (Tidak dipublikasikan). Materi Pelatihan analisis wacana: Teori dan aplikasi, UK2JT, Unair Surabaya, 28 Nov. 2013.
Haryatmoko. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: Landasan teori, metodologi, penerapan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Jupriono, D. (2011). Bahasa politik pencitraan Presiden SBY dalam perspektif linguistik kritis, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik & Sastra Dahulu, Sekarang dan Akan Datang, hal. 111-122. Surabaya: ITS Press & Prodi Sastra Inggris FISIB Unijoyo Bangkalan.
Jupriono, D.; Sudaryanto, E.; Sumarah, N. (2016). Retorika politik Jokowi: Kalimat aktif untuk keberhasilan, kalimat pasif untuk kegagalan. Proceeding International Conference of Communication, Industry and Community. Jilid 3, hal. 1035-1045. Jakarta: Fikom Untar.
Jupriono, D.; Sukristyanto, A.; Darmawan, A. (2016). Komunikasi politik Jokowi: Analisis wacana kritis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa & Sastra 8, hal. 44-50. Bangkalan: Prodi Sastra Inggris, FISIB, UTM.
Kelly, M. (2010). Michel Foucault. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/foucault/. Akses 17 Agustus 2019.
Mills, S. (2004). Michel Foucault and discourse, dlm Discourse. London-New York: Routledge.
O'Farrell, C. (2007). Key concepts. www.michel-foucault.com/concepts/index.html. Akses 17 Agustus 2019.
Santoso, A. (2000). Paradigma kritis dalam kajian kebahasaan. Bahasa dan Seni 28(2) Agustus: 127-146.
Santoso, A. (2010). Teori wacana: Dari paradigma deskriptif ke paradigma kritis. http://studibahasakritis.blogspot.com/2010/05/teori-wacana-dari-paradigma-deskriptif_08.html. Akses 17 Agustus 2019.
Sukristyanto, A.; Jupriono, D.; Darmawan, A.; Maryono. (2018). Political rhetoric of President Joko Widodo: Critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education and Practice 9(14), p. 113-117. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/42393/43659. Akses 17 Agustus 2019.
Tjandra, S. (2012). Orientasi gerakan buruh. Kompas, 1 Mei, hal. 6.
van de Velde, R.G. (1984). Prolegomena to inferential discourse processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamin P.C.
VOA. (2017). Masyarakat Papua dan masa depan PT Freeport Indonesia. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/masyarakt-papua-dan-masa-depan-pt-freeport-indonesia/3763024.html. 13 Maret 2017. Akses 17 Agustus 2019.
Wodak, R. (2010). The Contribution of critical linguistics to the analysis of discriminatory prejudices and stereotypes in the language of politics, in Handbook of communication in the public sphere, Wodak, R.; Koller, V.; Berlin, V. (eds.) (p. 291–316) New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 D. Jupriono, Andia Jingga L.P.T., Anaik Cahyaning Rahayu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in TANDA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Bahasa dan Sastra e-ISSN 2797-0477 will be asked to sign a Copyright Determination Form. In signing the form, it is assumed that the author has obtained permission to use copyrighted or previously published material. All authors must read and agree to the terms outlined in the form, and must sign the form or agree that the corresponding author can sign on their behalf. The article cannot be published until the signed form has been received. It is a condition of publication that authors grant copyright or license the publication rights in their article, including the abstract, to jurnaltanda@gmail.com. This allows us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course the Journal to the widest possible readership in both print and electronic formats.
