BENTUK KALIMAT, POSISI PROPOSISI, PRONOMINA, DAN NOMINALISASI DALAM RAGAM BAHASA POLITIK
Keywords:
imagology politic, critical linguistic, active-pasive senence, nominalization, propositionAbstract
Focus of the research study is sentence form (active-passive, personal pronoun, propositional position, nominalization) on SBY speech as the research data. By linguistic approach of Fowler and van Dijk critics, the data analysis achieves the following findings: (1) Active sentence is chosen by SBY to tell a success, while passive sentence is used to express a failure. (2) Clausal proposition which tells a success is expressed by positioning at the front, and one which expresses a failure is faded at behind. (3) Pronoun kita is chosen to explain the negative and to avoid critics; the words saya and pemerintah are used to tell the positive, the pronouns mereka, siapa pun, or direct reference of collective one are applied to give warning or threat. (4) Nominalization is used by SBY to hide failure of conducting development program, so his image as the successful leader is spotless. Generally, it can be concluded that SBY makes use of sentence form as media of politic of self image as a successful leader and as a mask to cover failure and to avoid critics.
References
Chung, S. (1989). Ihwal dua konstruksi pasif di dalam bahasa Indonesia. Dlm. B. Kaswanti-Purwo (ed.), Serpih-serpih Telaah Pasif Bahasa Indonesia. Seri ILDEP. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, hlm. 3—83
Eriyanto. (1999). Otoriterisme Orde Baru: Studi atas pidato-pidato Soeharto. Wacana 1(2), hlm: 209—235.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power. 3.[updated] ed. London: Routledge.
Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. Dlm. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (ed.), Text and Practices: Reading in Critical Discourse Analysis. London-New York: Routledge, hlm. 1—14.
Jupriono, D. (2001). Wacana humor verbal Gus Dur dalam perspektif tindak tutur. Humanika 5(2) Desember, hlm. 1—16.
Jupriono, D. (2004). Analisis wacana kritis pidato kenegaraan Presiden Megawati Soekarnoputri dalam perspektif komunikasi politik. Tesis S2 Prodi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, PPS Unitomo Surabaya.
Jupriono, D., Sudarwati, A.C. Rahayu, A. Andayani. (2009). Pidato kenegaraan Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dalam perspektif analisis wacana kritis. Laporan Penelitian, DP2M Ditjen Dikti, Depdiknas, Tahun Anggaran 2009.
Jupriono, D. (2010). Politik Pencitraan Presiden SBY Melalui Bentuk Kalimat: Kajian Linguistik Kritis. Makalah Naskah Pelatihan Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah Tahun 2010, DP2M Ditjen Dikti, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Untuk Berkala Nasional Terakreditasi, Surabaya, 26—29 Agustus 2010. https://sastra-bahasa.blogspot.com/2012/01/politik-pencitraan-presiden-sby-melalui.html#more . Akses 10-01-2022.
Jupriono, D.; Sukristyanto, A.; Darmawan, A. (2016). Komunikasi politik Jokowi: Analisis wacana kritis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa & Sastra (Senabastra) 8, UTM, 1 Ju ni 2016, hal. 44-50. Bangkalan: Sastra Inggris, FISIB, UTM.
Moeliono, A.M.; Lapoliwa, H.; Alwi, H.; Tjatur, S.S.; Sasangka, W.; Sugiyono. (2017). Tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia. Edisi IV. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Pick, A.C. (2009). Discourse and function: A framework of sentence structure. http://www.discourseandfunction.com/chapters/discourse_and_function.pdf. Akses 10-01-2022.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sukristyanto, A.; Jupriono, D.; Darmawan, A.; Maryono. (2018). Political rhetoric of President Joko Widodo: Critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(14), 113-117. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/42393. Akses 05-01-2022.
Sulistiyo, H. (2008). Waspadai politik pencitraan. www.inilah.com/berita/2008/05/26/30030/waspadai-politik-pencitraan/ Akses 15-10-2020.
Thurlow, C. (2007). Critical linguistics: The power of language in everyday life. http://faculty.washington. edu/thurlow/guestlectures/osher1.pdf. Akses 15-10-2020.
van Dijk, T.A. (1998). What is political discourse analysis? https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij. Akses 15-10-2020.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & society, 17(3), 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250. Akses 15-10-2020.
Wodak, R. (2008). The contribution of critical linguistics to the analysis of discriminatory prejudices and stereotypes in the language of politics. Dlm. Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, R. Wodak & V. Koller (ed.). New York- Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, hlm. 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198980.3.291. Akses 15-10-2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 D. Jupriono, Dinda Lisna Amilia, Fransisca B.A.C. Paramita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in TANDA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Bahasa dan Sastra e-ISSN 2797-0477 will be asked to sign a Copyright Determination Form. In signing the form, it is assumed that the author has obtained permission to use copyrighted or previously published material. All authors must read and agree to the terms outlined in the form, and must sign the form or agree that the corresponding author can sign on their behalf. The article cannot be published until the signed form has been received. It is a condition of publication that authors grant copyright or license the publication rights in their article, including the abstract, to jurnaltanda@gmail.com. This allows us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course the Journal to the widest possible readership in both print and electronic formats.
